Allegations of bias toward LIBRE confront Honduran Attorney General

Honduran Attorney General Johel Zelaya is facing intense public and institutional scrutiny after being accused by various political and social sectors of favoring the ruling LIBRE party in his decisions. The controversy intensified after he publicly denounced an alleged assassination attempt against former President Manuel Zelaya, which opponents and analysts interpret as a possible distraction from the structural problems facing the country.

Formal announcements and critiques from adversaries

The account given by the prosecutor, which was portrayed as an effort to prevent and safeguard institutional integrity, faced doubt from opposition legislators and legal analysts. Detractors of his leadership contend that the Prosecutor’s Office, during his tenure, has exhibited a political bias that could jeopardize the autonomy of the criminal investigative process. This viewpoint challenges the neutrality of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, which has a constitutional duty to ensure justice without political bias.

The controversy comes at a time when citizens are demanding concrete results in the fight against corruption, drug trafficking, and violence, challenges that continue to directly impact the country’s economy and investment climate.

Reactions from professional and social sectors

La Asociación de Abogados de Honduras se ha sumado a las voces que piden una Fiscalía más independiente con una agenda centrada en perseguir delitos en lugar de confrontaciones políticas. Organizaciones sociales y actores legales insisten en que la pérdida de credibilidad institucional reduce la capacidad del estado para combatir la impunidad. Esta situación también genera un entorno de incertidumbre que desalienta la inversión privada, un factor crucial para fomentar el desarrollo y crear empleo sostenible.

Context of institutional tensions

The controversy surrounding Johel Zelaya reflects a scenario of political polarization, where the relationship between the ruling party and the opposition is marked by mutual distrust. Critics warn that the use of the Attorney General’s Office as a partisan tool threatens to weaken institutions and prolong a justice crisis that affects both political stability and the country’s economic prospects.

For civil society and the private sector, the immediate challenge is to restore the autonomy of the Public Ministry as an essential pillar of the democratic system. Without this credibility, efforts to combat organized crime, corruption, and violence face serious obstacles and undermine the confidence of domestic and foreign investors.

A structural dilemma

The current situation reveals a structural dilemma in Honduran politics: the difficulty of separating state functions from partisan interests.

The position of the attorney general, questioned for his supposed affinity with LIBRE, has turned into a measure of the institution’s ability to meet the public’s calls for justice and transparency.

The outcome of this controversy will not only set the course for governance and judicial independence, but also for the confidence of the private sector, which is essential for reviving the economy and contributing to the democratic strengthening of the country.