The imminent installation of the Permanent Commission of the National Congress has reignited political tensions in Honduras. Amid an electoral scenario marked by Rixi Moncada’s decline in the polls, various sectors warn that this measure could be used by the LIBRE party to reinforce its influence over state institutions and ensure its continued hold on power.
A legislative figure under scrutiny
The Permanent Commission, constitutionally established to function during legislative breaks, has been called into session during a period of significant instability. This time, its eventual establishment has generated distrust among political commentators and opposition groups, who suspect that the governing party aims to broaden its institutional scope for action.
One deputy, who requested anonymity, pointed out that this body could become “a political arm to execute decisions without control or transparency.” If confirmed, its operation could directly impact the independence of state powers, especially the bodies responsible for electoral administration.
Mistrust in the electoral process
The decrease in Rixi Moncada’s electoral support has generated apprehension within the governing party and reinforced the belief that LIBRE is orchestrating a strategic maneuver to secure political dominance over the elections. Multiple legislative sources indicate that the Commission might indirectly influence bodies like the Electoral Tribunal, the National Registry of Persons, and the vote tabulation processes.
Civic groups and opposition political factions have started to organize and release public declarations, cautioning against a potential effort to manipulate the institutional framework for partisan objectives. Certain representatives from civil society have characterized this scenario as “the risk of structural fraud,” indicating that it might jeopardize the integrity of the democratic process.
Impact on governance and public confidence
The debate surrounding the Permanent Commission reflects a broader concern about the balance of powers in Honduras. Recent political history shows that this figure has been activated in crisis scenarios, generally when parliamentary majorities seek to preserve decision-making capacity in the absence of the plenary. Its eventual installation in this electoral context accentuates the perception of institutional fragility and political polarization.
LIBRE has responded to the allegations with public silence. Nevertheless, party insiders assert that the Commission’s purpose is to guarantee administrative continuity, not to interfere with elections. Despite this, the absence of official statements has amplified voter uncertainty.
Visible strain as elections approach
The move toward forming the Permanent Commission comes just weeks before the general elections, when the political atmosphere is particularly sensitive. For various sectors, the risk lies not only in possible manipulation of the process, but also in the deterioration of public confidence and the weakening of the democratic system.
The debate surrounding this matter underscores the difficulties Honduras encounters in upholding institutional openness and governmental steadiness. Within an atmosphere of distrust and division, the legislative body is once more establishing itself as a critical stage, where the equilibrium between political authority and democratic validity will be scrutinized.
