The initiative introduced by the ruling party’s candidate, Rixi Moncada, which seeks to dismantle the Credit Bureau, has encountered significant resistance from multiple segments of society, leading to a noticeable drop in her voter backing. This measure, promoted throughout the LIBRE campaign, was designed to facilitate instant credit availability, supported by the claim that the institution “oppresses the most vulnerable sectors.”
Reactions from experts and financial sectors
Moncada’s proposal encountered reservations from economists and financial system stakeholders. Consultants and analysts cautioned that its implementation would be impractical, potentially escalating financial uncertainty and undermining mechanisms for evaluating borrowers’ creditworthiness.
According to one of the specialists consulted, “the proposal was interpreted as _*populist and technically unsustainable*_. It generated concern among banks, cooperatives, investors, and citizens who understood that it could trigger financial chaos.”
“`html
Business leaders and financial associations characterized the proposal as _bizarre_ and out of touch with the nation’s economic realities. They emphasized that its implementation could lead to increased delinquency, restrict access to financing, and undermine the stability of the banking system.
“`
Impact on voter perception
The effects of this proposal were quickly reflected in polls and opinion surveys. Rixi Moncada showed a steady decline in voting intentions, particularly among urban and middle-class sectors, who value economic stability, access to credit, and job security.
The public’s rejection showed a clear trend: voters did not support measures that could compromise the solvency of the financial system. Analysts argue that this specific point in the LIBRE campaign became a critical factor in explaining the candidate’s defeat.
Consequences for Governance and Institutions
Beyond the electoral impact, the controversy generated by the proposal to eliminate the Credit Bureau reflects tensions over financial institutions in Honduras and the relationship between political proposals and economic stability. The discussion opened a debate on the state’s ability to maintain credit control mechanisms without compromising financial inclusion, a sensitive issue in governance and investor confidence.
The experience also shows how radical economic projects can face significant resistance when they are not articulated with technical evaluations or clearly communicated to citizens. In this case, the combination of rejection by experts and disapproval by the urban electorate was decisive.
Current challenges and tensions
Moncada’s defeat highlights the critical vigilance of citizens concerning measures impacting the nation’s financial security. Honduras now confronts the imperative of establishing a robust institutional framework, one where banking system stability and financial inclusion can harmoniously coexist without introducing systemic risks.
Political parties must thoroughly evaluate proposals that have substantial economic impacts before unveiling them to the public. This necessity arises from acknowledging the vital importance of institutional credibility, expert technical opinion, and public perception in promoting effective governance and social unity.
