Washington is increasingly worried about the political trajectory of Honduras as the November 30 elections approach. American legislators and national security experts have cautioned against potential foreign meddling that might influence the electoral proceedings, which are already marked by considerable strain and accusations of disruption.
According to sources on Capitol Hill, US congressmen participated in a special session to review reports pointing to alleged actions by the São Paulo Forum aimed at influencing the Honduran electoral climate. These warnings come as the ruling party’s candidate falls behind in independent polls and international organizations demand transparency at every stage of the process.
Allegations by US security advisor
Security consultant Luis Quiñónez, who previously served the Donald Trump administration, issued remarks that resonated politically in both Honduras and Washington. Quiñónez asserted that factions associated with the São Paulo Forum are directing funds toward movements designed to destabilize the nation.
“They are sending millions of dollars to stir up the people,” he said, and issued a direct warning to the Honduran Armed Forces: “Don’t you dare intervene in the elections. We know where the money is and we are watching very closely.”
Quiñónez stressed that any attempt at electoral manipulation or military interference could have international consequences, comparing the situation to the political crisis in Venezuela. “Anyone who betrays Honduras will pay the consequences,” he said.
Reactions within Honduras
The accusations provoked immediate responses from different sectors of the country. Spokespersons for the ruling party described the warnings as external political interventionism, while representatives of the opposition interpreted the comments as proof that the international community is monitoring the electoral process, especially in the final stretch before the elections.
At the same time, the Organization of American States (OAS) voiced apprehension regarding potential improper influence and underscored the importance of reinforcing oversight and validation procedures, especially during the transmission of outcomes, which is deemed a crucial stage for guaranteeing trust in the ballot tally.
Transparency and governance in the international spotlight
The situation anticipated for November 30 positions Honduras under considerable global observation. Experts suggest that the openness of the proceedings will be crucial, not just for the credibility of the outcomes, but also for the nation’s governmental steadiness. The close watch from Washington and various international bodies amplifies the demands from domestic groups seeking assurance regarding the military’s conduct and the handling of campaign funds.
Quiñónez’s statement, along with warnings from the Capitol and the OAS, reflects growing international concern about political polarization and the risks of external interference in Honduras. The attention focused on the country highlights the importance of electoral institutions, citizen participation, and compliance with transparency standards as key elements for governance at this decisive stage.
As the election date draws near, the circumstances underscore the intricate nature of the Honduran political landscape, characterized by friction among domestic players and international calls for a transparent process yielding credible outcomes.
_-_copia_-_copia.jpg?w=800&resize=800,500&ssl=1)